Canada’s Submarine Competition Selection Criteria

By Dan Middlemiss, 30 June 2026

The evaluation criteria that will be the basis for selecting Canada’s new submarine replacement have come to light recently. (see Judy Trinh,  "Will the Germans or South Koreans emerge as Canada’s sub deal winner?", www.ctvnews.ca, 29 June 2026, https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/will-the-germans-or-south-koreans-emerge-as-canadas-sub-deal-winner/)

The criteria, with their individual weighting, are reported to be:

“Sustainment (50%): Evaluates long-term maintenance, repair and operational support plans over the submarine fleet’s multi-decade lifespan.

Submarine Platform (20%): Assesses technical specifications, stealth, under-ice capabilities and military performance.

Financial (15%): Covers the upfront capital cost and build budget for the conventionally powered vessels.

Strategic and Economic Partnerships (15%): Measures foreign investment, domestic job creation, and strategic alignment with Canada's geopolitical goals”

Notably, this evaluation framework does not include any reference to early delivery schedule, a concern that Vice Admiral Topshee repeatedly emphasized was a priority concern for the Canadian Navy.

This omission would appear to negate what many thought was a clear advantage for the South Korean bid. While the German bid is said to include a recent pledge to move the delivery of submarines to Canada up in the production queue and ahead of Germany’s and Norway’s own spots, some might question how binding this pledge really is, and whether this remains something that still would have to be negotiated with the three partners – no mean feat.

Post continues on the Broadsides Forum

Trending now:

• Canada’s Submarine Competition Selection Criteria
• Dollars and Sense: Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy
• A View from the West: A ‘Reunified’ China in 2027?
• US Navy Submarines: A Retirement Issue
• CNR sponsors: visit page

Current Issue: Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026)

And, of course, we have our usual Making Waves commentaries. In response to enthusiastic discussion on Broadsides (our online discussion forum), we have a commentary about whether geography is destiny for Canada – i.e., as a small (in terms of population) country next door to the United States, does Canada have options for defence? There’s a commentary asking if naval art is dead, a commentary about naval capabilities for the Arctic, and a commentary about how the RCN can make the navy more visible to Canadians.

And, of course, we have our regular columns. “A View from the West” looks at whether China is indeed capable of/intending to invade Taiwan in 2027. “Dollars and Sense” examines the Defence Industrial Strategy, and “Warship Developments” updates us on recent naval developments.  

Naturally, we have our usual amazing photos!

The spring issue will be in the mailbox of people who are lucky enough to be subscribers! It’s not too late for you to subscribe. See here for the Table of Contents.

CNR resources

• CNR Archives
• Subject Index for CNR Articles
• Broadsides Forum - Join the Discussion
• Submissions to Canadian Naval Review
• Subscriptions - unlock access to all CNR materials
• Sponsor page
• Free CNR articles and PDF downloads
• Follow us on Bluesky and LinkedIn
• Donate to CNR
• Special offer

Read more: CNR Archives (60+ magazines in PDF) and Subject Index (600+ articles)

Looking for Books about Maritime Matters?

Over the last 20 years, Canadian Naval Review has published over 180 book reviews. These books cover a variety of topics but they all relate to maritime matters, history, or security and defence at sea. This is an amazing resource. Go through the list of reviews, pick out a few books that look interesting, read the reviews, and then order the books from your nearest bookstore or from the publisher. See the list of book reviews at https://www.navalreview.ca/book-reviews/