Royal Navy Not Looking So Good

By Moderator, 14 May 2026

A few weeks ago, US President Donald Trump referred to the Royal Navy’s aircraft carriers as ‘toys’ and dismissed British naval capabilities as ‘old and broken.’ That he was asking for the RN’s assistance in the Strait of Hormuz at the time is an interesting method of diplomacy.  

We may not like what Trump said, but there’s no denying that the RN is a sad shadow of its former glorious self. Although it has not formally been decommissioned, the weapons and sensors of HMS Iron Duke were stripped and the ship has not left port since October 2025. [See https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/11/warship-hms-iron-duke-costly-refit-scrapheap/]

Having had a refit less than 3 years ago, withdrawal of Iron Duke from active service raises some questions about the ability of the RN fleet to carry on with its tasks. The decommissioning of HMS Richmond this year has been already confirmed. That will mean the RN will have 5 active frigates, and there are concerns about how long these ships can keep going.

Several of these ships will be assigned to anti-submarine warfare and submarine monitoring commitments in the Atlantic and high North as part of the RN’s contribution to NATO’s sub-surface deterrence. This means that the RN might now struggle to assign a frigate to the Carrier Strike Group which, at minimum, should be comprised of 2 frigates and 2 destroyers. Other smaller ships will now be responsible for monitoring the Russian ships and submarines regularly transiting through the English channel.

Post continues on the Broadsides Forum

Trending now:

• Royal Navy Not Looking So Good
• A Case for a Constellation-class Flight II
• To Pivot or Not to Pivot?
• Russia’s Interference with NATO’s Undersea Cables
• CNR sponsors: visit page

Preview Next Issue: Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026)

And, of course, we have our usual Making Waves commentaries. In response to enthusiastic discussion on Broadsides (our online discussion forum), we have a commentary about whether geography is destiny for Canada – i.e., as a small (in terms of population) country next door to the United States, does Canada have options for defence? There’s a commentary asking if naval art is dead, a commentary about naval capabilities for the Arctic, and a commentary about how the RCN can make the navy more visible to Canadians.

And, of course, we have our regular columns. “A View from the West” looks at whether China is indeed capable of/intending to invade Taiwan in 2027. “Dollars and Sense” examines the Defence Industrial Strategy, and “Warship Developments” updates us on recent naval developments.  

Naturally, we have our usual amazing photos!

Stay tuned. In a few weeks, the issue will be in the mailbox of people who are lucky enough to be subscribers! It’s not too late for you to subscribe. See here for the Table of Contents.

CNR resources

• CNR Archives
• Subject Index for CNR Articles
• Broadsides Forum - Join the Discussion
• Submissions to Canadian Naval Review
• Subscriptions - unlock access to all CNR materials
• Sponsor page
• Free CNR articles and PDF downloads
• Follow us on Bluesky and LinkedIn
• Donate to CNR
• Special offer

Read more: CNR Archives (60+ magazines in PDF) and Subject Index (600+ articles)

Looking for Books about Maritime Matters?

Over the last 20 years, Canadian Naval Review has published over 180 book reviews. These books cover a variety of topics but they all relate to maritime matters, history, or security and defence at sea. This is an amazing resource. Go through the list of reviews, pick out a few books that look interesting, read the reviews, and then order the books from your nearest bookstore or from the publisher. See the list of book reviews at https://www.navalreview.ca/book-reviews/